Feasibility of an Animal Model for Cavopulmonary Support With a Double-Outflow Pump.

Both single- and double-outflow cavopulmonary assist devices (CPADs) were recently proposed for the Fontan population, whereas single-outflow configurations were evaluated in large animal trials and double-outflow concepts are lacking an equivalent in vivo assessment. The aim of this study was to test the hemodynamic properties of a double-outflow CPAD device in an acute sheep model. The two inflow cannulae of a CPAD were anastomosed to the caval veins. Outflow graft connection was performed via end-to-side anastomosis to the right (RPA) and main pulmonary artery (MPA). Speed ramp protocols were conducted, and hemodynamic effects were monitored in terms of caval flows, cardiac output (CO), central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), and left atrial pressure (LAP). Six experiments were conducted (53.35 ± 5.1 kg). In three experiments, the animal model was established, the CPAD was examined, and restoration of biventricular equivalency in terms of venous return was achieved. Venous pressures (CVP) declined linearly with increasing pump speed (r > 0.879), whereas caval flow (r > 0.973), CO (r > 0.993), PAP (r > 0.973), and LAP (r > 0.408) increased. Despite the considerable complexity of the sheep model caused by the sheep pulmonary arterial anatomy that requires substantial graft bending, the CPAD was evaluated in three acute experiments and showed the potential to completely substitute a subpulmonary ventricle.

It's not only the pump: Assessment of human factors of wearable components and user experience of patients with left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Despite design improvements in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) over the past decade, limitations of external, wearable VAD components affect patient quality of life and safety. The aim of this study was to describe both user experience and human factor issues of 2 contemporary LVADs. METHODS: This single-center, cross-sectional study included LVAD outpatients who were at least 3 months after implantation. Before developing the 16-item survey, a systematic literature review and 2-round Delphi method involving 9 VAD clinicians were used to select items in 6 domains: power supply, emergency situations, wearability, mobility, and freedom to travel, user modifications, lifestyle, and home adaptations. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (61.6 ± 11.6 years, 13.8% female, HeartMate 3 (HM3)/HVAD: n = 39/19) completed the one-time survey after median of 853 days on device: 10.3% reported problems changing power supply, 12.7% unintentional driveline disconnection (HM3: 5.6% vs HVAD: 26.3%, p = 0.041). Against the recommendation 74.1% sleep with battery-support (HM3: 88.9% vs HVAD: 44.4%, p = 0.001). About 65.3% criticized the carry bag weight/size (HM3: 71.4% vs HVAD: 50.0%, p = 0.035), thus 24.1% wear an own carrying-system, 42.1% modified their wearables, 38.9% their clothing, and 65.3% their home to cope with life on LVAD support. Mobility is reduced due to limited wearability: 18.9% went abroad (only 3.7% by plane) and 40.0% use less public transport than before implantation (the older the less: r = -0.37, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: HVAD and HM3 wearables still show a variety of human factors issues and potential for improved user experience. User-centered design and incorporation of patient feedback may increase user satisfaction, and patient safety.

A Standardized Telephone Intervention Algorithm Improves the Survival of Ventricular Assist Device Outpatients.

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are an established therapeutic option for patients with chronic heart failure. Continuous monitoring of VAD parameters and their adherence to guidelines are crucial to detect problems in an early stage to optimize outcomes. A telephone intervention algorithm for VAD outpatients was developed, clinically implemented and evaluated. During the phone calls, a structured inquiry of pump parameters, alarms, blood pressure, INR, body weight and temperature, exit-site status and heart failure symptoms was performed and electronically categorized by an algorithm into 5 levels of severity. VAD outpatient outcomes without (n = 71) and with bi-weekly telephone interviews in their usual care (n = 25) were conducted using proportional hazard Cox regression, with risk adjustment based on a propensity score model computed from demographics and risk factors. From February 2015 through October 2017, 25 patients (n = 3 HeartMate II, n = 4 HeartMate 3 and n = 18 HeartWare HVAD) underwent 637 telephone interventions. In 57.5% of the calls no problems were identified, 3.9% were recalled on the next day because of alarms. In 26.5% (n = 169), the VAD Coordinator had to refer to the physician due to elevated blood pressure (n = 125, >85 mm Hg), INR < 2.0 or > 4.0 (n = 24) or edema (n = 10), 11.9% of the calls led to a follow-up because of equipment or exit-site problems. Propensity-adjusted 2-year survival (89% vs. 57%, P = 0.027) was significantly higher for the telephone intervention group. Continuous, standardized communication with VAD outpatients is important for early detection of upcoming problems and leads to significantly improved survival.